PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-93.01%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with EQT at -77.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-5.25%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 10.71%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-73.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-522.22%
Both cut yoy SBC, with EQT at -26.19%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-190.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -889.20%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -204.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-72.92%
Negative yoy while EQT is 729.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-62.50%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -21.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-43.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -15.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-243.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.31%
Purchases growth of 43.31% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
105.31%
Liquidation growth of 105.31% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-68.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 7993.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-273.43%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 41.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-8211.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 98.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.