40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-962.12%
Negative net income growth while EQT stands at 649.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.33%
D&A growth well above EQT's 0.18%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-813.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EQT stands at 55.79%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
94.64%
SBC growth well above EQT's 70.60%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
95.74%
Well above EQT's 174.75% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth well above EQT's 166.35%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.74%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. EQT's 193.05%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
214.46%
Some yoy increase while EQT is negative at -108.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
84.67%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x EQT's 66.10%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
14.12%
CapEx growth well above EQT's 7.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
113.94%
Acquisition growth of 113.94% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.95%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
13.68%
We have some outflow growth while EQT is negative at -116.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
104.06%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -98.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
94.52%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -1781.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.