40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.68%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -71.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.45%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
6.23%
Some yoy growth while EQT is negative at -430.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
366.67%
SBC growth while EQT is negative at -15.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1933.33%
Well above EQT's 17.25% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1933.33%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -51.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-38.95%
Negative yoy while EQT is 158.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-38.17%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -55.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-0.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -10.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-83.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 115.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-116.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
442.34%
Liquidation growth of 442.34% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
0.99%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. EQT's 115.39%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-354.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -0.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1508.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 60.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -3.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.