PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-58.58%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with EQT at -304.47%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-11.88%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-49.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
314.29%
SBC growth while EQT is negative at -13.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-259.32%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EQT is 102.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-113.10%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EQT at -177.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-259.32%
Negative yoy usage while EQT is 97.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
163.89%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. EQT's 11836.99%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-47.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -26.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
40.11%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -6.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-120.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -3656.94%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-115.60%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1691.67%
Liquidation growth of 1691.67% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
40.11%
We have some outflow growth while EQT is negative at -2750.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.47%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -16.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-93.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 45.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.