PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
253.38%
Net income growth at 75-90% of EQT's 330.46%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
1.63%
Some D&A expansion while EQT is negative at -5.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-50.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EQT stands at 391.60%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-48.89%
Negative yoy SBC while EQT is 46.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-73.91%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EQT is 148.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
202.94%
AR growth well above EQT's 141.81%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.00%
Negative yoy usage while EQT is 147.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-97.87%
Both negative yoy, with EQT at -146.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-46.73%
Negative yoy CFO while EQT is 73.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-13.03%
Negative yoy CapEx while EQT is 29.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-637.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -105.06%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
714.29%
Purchases growth of 714.29% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-84.42%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 361.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-57.96%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 50.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
5.88%
Debt repayment well below EQT's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.