PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-55.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with EQT at -387.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.44%
D&A growth well above EQT's 2.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.15%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
105.88%
Less SBC growth vs. EQT's 253.26%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -60.40%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
207.02%
AR growth while EQT is negative at -66.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -60.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
29.17%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. EQT's 277.54%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-16.56%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with EQT at -28.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.53%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -24.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
1073.33%
Acquisition growth of 1073.33% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-373.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-373.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -106.37%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
29.31%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -24.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
91.75%
Debt repayment above 1.5x EQT's 56.62%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.56%
We have some buyback growth while EQT is negative at -1078.31%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.