40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
59.63%
Net income growth at 50-75% of EQT's 110.60%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-1.23%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 7.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
71.43%
Well above EQT's 112.74% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.76%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EQT is 132.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-283.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EQT at -164.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.76%
Negative yoy usage while EQT is 327.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
181.25%
Some yoy increase while EQT is negative at -115.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
45.84%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of EQT's 120.17%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
2.28%
Lower CapEx growth vs. EQT's 8.12%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-47.37%
Negative yoy acquisition while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
64.67%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. EQT's 397.73%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-82.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -240.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
69.83%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -68.98%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.