40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.84%
Net income growth under 50% of EQT's 521.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.43%
D&A growth well above EQT's 12.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
240.46%
Well above EQT's 224.37% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
16.67%
SBC growth while EQT is negative at -21.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
163.53%
Slight usage while EQT is negative at -1369.56%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
133.37%
AR growth while EQT is negative at -4816.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with EQT at -76.59%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while EQT is 571.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
119.78%
Growth well above EQT's 7.54%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
8632.93%
Some yoy increase while EQT is negative at -1894.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
44.87%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x EQT's 37.35%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
24.89%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -5.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
234.68%
Acquisition spending well above EQT's 100.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-696.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -1018.63%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
15.20%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. EQT's 80.66%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-15084.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 99.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.78%
We cut yoy buybacks while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.