PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.59%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -90.77%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.28%
Some D&A expansion while EQT is negative at -4.81%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
75.62%
Some yoy growth while EQT is negative at -296.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-43.48%
Negative yoy SBC while EQT is 14.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
99.39%
Slight usage while EQT is negative at -140.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-63.37%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EQT at -135.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.65%
AP growth well above EQT's 159.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
77.17%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -469.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-102.14%
Negative yoy while EQT is 132.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
52.98%
Some CFO growth while EQT is negative at -72.13%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -4.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
99.02%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. EQT's 919.09%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-365.49%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 97.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
17.07%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. EQT's 44.98%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
75.38%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -26246.35%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.40%
Buyback growth of 26.40% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.