40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-111.83%
Negative net income growth while EQT stands at 239.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-280.95%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EQT stands at 236.89%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.00%
Slight usage while EQT is negative at -771.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-169.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EQT at -694.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
337.21%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -216.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
127.13%
Some yoy increase while EQT is negative at -18.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.20%
Negative yoy CFO while EQT is 27.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
4.85%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -3.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-736.36%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 47607.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-4.46%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 145.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-100.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -595.98%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.