PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-134.19%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 153.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.75%
Less D&A growth vs. OBE's 33.59%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-82.16%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OBE stands at 51.22%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.45%
Slight usage while OBE is negative at -241.67%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.34%
Growth of 83.34% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-1545.00%
Both negative yoy, with OBE at -78.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
215.67%
Some CFO growth while OBE is negative at -29.62%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -7.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
42.47%
Some acquisitions while OBE is negative at -44.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
23.58%
Purchases growth of 23.58% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
16.70%
Liquidation growth of 16.70% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-11.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -60.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-3.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -182.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x OBE's 52.15%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-75.00%
Negative yoy issuance while OBE is 2130.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
44.06%
Buyback growth of 44.06% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.