PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-233.51%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with OBE at -2796.30%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
370.00%
Some yoy growth while OBE is negative at -4400.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
46.67%
SBC growth while OBE is negative at -25.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-161.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while OBE is 1092.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-161.00%
Negative yoy usage while OBE is 1076.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-10.81%
Negative yoy while OBE is 1171.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-50.59%
Negative yoy CFO while OBE is 29.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-11.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -201.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
41.18%
Acquisition growth of 41.18% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
11.86%
Purchases growth of 11.86% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
16.07%
Liquidation growth of 16.07% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-10.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while OBE is 17700.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6.51%
We reduce yoy invests while OBE stands at 593.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.