PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-962.12%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 86.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.33%
Some D&A expansion while OBE is negative at -82.19%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-813.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OBE stands at 88.54%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
94.64%
SBC growth while OBE is negative at -66.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
95.74%
Less working capital growth vs. OBE's 816.67%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.74%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. OBE's 816.67%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
214.46%
Well above OBE's 85.71%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
84.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x OBE's 30.00%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
14.12%
CapEx growth well above OBE's 22.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
113.94%
Acquisition growth of 113.94% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.95%
We reduce yoy sales while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
13.68%
We have some outflow growth while OBE is negative at -121.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
104.06%
We have mild expansions while OBE is negative at -348.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
94.52%
Debt repayment above 1.5x OBE's 20.56%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.