40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-58.58%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with OBE at -32.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-11.88%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with OBE at -29.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-49.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while OBE stands at 22.41%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
314.29%
SBC growth of 314.29% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-259.32%
Both reduce yoy usage, with OBE at -126.92%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-113.10%
AR is negative yoy while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-259.32%
Both reduce yoy usage, with OBE at -134.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
163.89%
Well above OBE's 120.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-47.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with OBE at -191.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
40.11%
Lower CapEx growth vs. OBE's 94.44%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-115.60%
Negative yoy purchasing while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1691.67%
Liquidation growth of 1691.67% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
40.11%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. OBE's 127700.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
20.47%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. OBE's 7611.76%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-93.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -4285.71%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.