40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.59%
Net income growth under 50% of OBE's 211.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.28%
Some D&A expansion while OBE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
75.62%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. OBE's 172.09%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-43.48%
Negative yoy SBC while OBE is 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
99.39%
Slight usage while OBE is negative at -121.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-63.37%
AR is negative yoy while OBE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.65%
AP growth of 97.65% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
77.17%
Some yoy usage while OBE is negative at -121.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-102.14%
Negative yoy while OBE is 876.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
52.98%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x OBE's 30.32%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-3.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -26.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
99.02%
Acquisition growth of 99.02% while OBE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-365.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with OBE at -310.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
17.07%
We have mild expansions while OBE is negative at -62.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
75.38%
We repay more while OBE is negative at -77.62%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.40%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x OBE's 17.14%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.