40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
56.44%
Some net income increase while PR is negative at -46.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-5.86%
Negative yoy D&A while PR is 6.79%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
26.83%
Some yoy growth while PR is negative at -38.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-211.41%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PR is 482.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.11%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PR's 285.30%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
32.55%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PR's 15.66%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
5.61%
CapEx growth of 5.61% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.11%
Growth well above PR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
92.75%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -210.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
68.49%
Debt repayment growth of 68.49% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-31.09%
Negative yoy issuance while PR is 80.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
103.42%
Buyback growth of 103.42% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.