40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-438.75%
Negative net income growth while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-11.24%
Negative yoy D&A while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
147.62%
Deferred tax of 147.62% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
154.17%
SBC growth of 154.17% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-21400.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21400.00%
Negative yoy usage while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-101.55%
Negative yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-52.86%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
8.33%
CapEx growth of 8.33% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-93.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
2206.45%
Purchases growth of 2206.45% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-80.38%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
10.70%
Growth of 10.70% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-178.01%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
33.33%
Debt repayment growth of 33.33% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.