40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
269.37%
Net income growth of 269.37% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
-0.25%
Negative yoy D&A while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-267.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-146.15%
Negative yoy SBC while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.33%
Working capital change of 62.33% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.33%
Growth of 62.33% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-10.00%
Negative yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.91%
CFO growth of 63.91% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
10.63%
CapEx growth of 10.63% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
262.79%
Acquisition growth of 262.79% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-103.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
317.65%
Liquidation growth of 317.65% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
5.77%
Growth of 5.77% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
20.04%
We expand invests by 20.04% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
50.00%
Debt repayment growth of 50.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.