40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-74.25%
Negative net income growth while PR stands at 275.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.52%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
94.57%
Deferred tax of 94.57% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
350.00%
SBC growth of 350.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
470.37%
Slight usage while PR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
470.37%
Some yoy usage while PR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
268.18%
Well above PR's 20.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
68.77%
Some CFO growth while PR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-0.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-83.65%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
3013.64%
Purchases growth of 3013.64% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-91.24%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.68%
We have some outflow growth while PR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-43.80%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.