40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
146.22%
Some net income increase while PR is negative at -226.35%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.73%
D&A growth of 7.73% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-55.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
22.40%
Working capital change of 22.40% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.40%
Growth of 22.40% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
72.73%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PR's 285.63%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
104.11%
CFO growth of 104.11% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
28.73%
CapEx growth of 28.73% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-66.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-28.73%
Negative yoy purchasing while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-41.54%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
26.70%
Growth of 26.70% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
19.78%
We expand invests by 19.78% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-57.23%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.