40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-962.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -200.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.33%
Some D&A expansion while PR is negative at -20.03%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-813.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
94.64%
SBC growth of 94.64% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
95.74%
Well above PR's 138.11% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth well above PR's 166.19%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.74%
Growth well above PR's 90.38%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
214.46%
Well above PR's 131.32%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
84.67%
Some CFO growth while PR is negative at -20.48%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.12%
CapEx growth well above PR's 18.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
113.94%
Acquisition growth of 113.94% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.95%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
13.68%
We have some outflow growth while PR is negative at -79.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
104.06%
Investing outflow well above PR's 12.99%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
94.52%
Debt repayment growth of 94.52% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.