40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.68%
Net income growth of 5.68% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
-15.45%
Negative yoy D&A while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
6.23%
Deferred tax of 6.23% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
366.67%
SBC growth of 366.67% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
1933.33%
Working capital change of 1933.33% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1933.33%
Growth of 1933.33% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-38.95%
Negative yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-38.17%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.95%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-83.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-116.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
442.34%
Liquidation growth of 442.34% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
0.99%
Growth of 0.99% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-354.10%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1508.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.