40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
152.75%
Some net income increase while PR is negative at -686344.66%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-20.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PR at -8.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
116.70%
Deferred tax of 116.70% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
82.76%
SBC growth of 82.76% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
36.17%
Less working capital growth vs. PR's 1384.93%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
247.37%
AR growth well above PR's 150.53%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.17%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PR's 172.85%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
34.78%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PR's 1790.08%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
124.10%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PR's 35536.05%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
4.65%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PR's 75.38%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
104100.00%
Acquisition growth of 104100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
91.07%
Purchases growth of 91.07% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-4.65%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
4.65%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PR's 170385.37%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
405.15%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PR's 170385.37%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-457.20%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 98.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.