PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-188.64%
Negative net income growth while PR stands at 95.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Deferred tax of 11.84% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-15.09%
Negative yoy SBC while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-53.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -120.21%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-342.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PR at -179.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -333.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-24.19%
Both negative yoy, with PR at -99.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.99%
Some CFO growth while PR is negative at -81.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-72.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -5534.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-99.23%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1080.00%
Purchases growth of 1080.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
72.20%
Liquidation growth of 72.20% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-47.32%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 25.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-129.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -538.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
98.87%
Debt repayment above 1.5x PR's 63.24%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-84.91%
Negative yoy issuance while PR is 408.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.