40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
253.38%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 219.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
1.63%
Less D&A growth vs. PR's 75.65%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-50.59%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-48.89%
Negative yoy SBC while PR is 95.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-73.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -3355.72%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
202.94%
AR growth while PR is negative at -830.11%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.00%
Negative yoy usage while PR is 65.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-97.87%
Negative yoy while PR is 73.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-46.73%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 104.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-13.03%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 88.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-637.50%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
714.29%
Purchases growth of 714.29% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-84.42%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -99.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-57.96%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
5.88%
Debt repayment well below PR's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.