PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-200.00%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -4.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.09%
D&A growth well above PR's 13.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-200.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PR stands at 4.20%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
533.33%
SBC growth well above PR's 7.43%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-1225.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PR is 258.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-7000.00%
AR is negative yoy while PR is 143.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
700.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PR's 4400.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
211.11%
Some yoy increase while PR is negative at -30.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
24.67%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of PR's 45.70%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-17.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 36.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
170.59%
Acquisition growth of 170.59% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
520.00%
We have some outflow growth while PR is negative at -92.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
13.95%
Investing outflow well above PR's 1.74%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-4.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 64.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.82%
Buyback growth below 50% of PR's 66.15%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.