PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-104.03%
Negative net income growth while PR stands at 360.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.94%
Less D&A growth vs. PR's 8.99%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-204.55%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
800.00%
SBC growth while PR is negative at -5.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-34.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PR is 409.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-213.11%
AR is negative yoy while PR is 250.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -5.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-58.82%
Negative yoy while PR is 206.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-3.44%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 71.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-1.41%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-85.62%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.24%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PR's 158.32%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-5.16%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 1.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
51.16%
We repay more while PR is negative at -178.57%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 78.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.