40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
59.63%
Some net income increase while PR is negative at -72.05%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.23%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PR at -16.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
71.43%
Well above PR's 138.12% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -229.29%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-283.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PR at -129.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.76%
Negative yoy usage while PR is 65.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
181.25%
Some yoy increase while PR is negative at -94.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
45.84%
Some CFO growth while PR is negative at -10.03%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.28%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PR's 40.05%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-47.37%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
64.67%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PR's 180.36%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-82.45%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 40.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
69.83%
Debt repayment above 1.5x PR's 12.50%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.