40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.01%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -32.23%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-23.63%
Negative yoy D&A while PR is 24.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-26.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
253.33%
SBC growth well above PR's 99.73%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-35.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PR is 121.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-34.13%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PR at -590.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
19.05%
Inventory growth of 19.05% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
44.37%
Lower AP growth vs. PR's 324.72%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-35.14%
Negative yoy usage while PR is 584.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
124.07%
Well above PR's 129.50%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-22.19%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 2.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-4.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 2.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-1249.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -101.74%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.85%
We have some outflow growth while PR is negative at -101.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-248.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -39.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
98.59%
We repay more while PR is negative at -75.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.76%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of PR's 90.34%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.