40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-23.47%
Negative net income growth while RRC stands at 42.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.36%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -0.62%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-318.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RRC stands at 41.45%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.02%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -673.24%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
637.40%
Well above RRC's 143.05%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
98.00%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RRC's 0.79%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
9.45%
Some CapEx rise while RRC is negative at -33.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.44%
Growth well above RRC's 103.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
25.42%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. RRC's 79.10%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
85.03%
Debt repayment growth of 85.03% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
746.59%
Stock issuance far above RRC's 221.26%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-26.20%
We cut yoy buybacks while RRC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.