PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
226.57%
Net income growth above 1.5x RRC's 12.92%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-48.89%
Negative yoy D&A while RRC is 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1240.68%
Well above RRC's 15.56% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.30%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -25.99%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while RRC is negative at -141.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-23.02%
Both negative yoy, with RRC at -320.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
21.05%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x RRC's 14.53%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
18.58%
Some CapEx rise while RRC is negative at -44.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-155.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -4522.48%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
168.74%
Purchases growth of 168.74% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-162.53%
We reduce yoy sales while RRC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-157.56%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 322.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
365.10%
We have mild expansions while RRC is negative at -498.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
17.77%
Debt repayment growth of 17.77% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
227.31%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. RRC's 18336.59%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-186831.83%
We cut yoy buybacks while RRC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.