PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.69%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RRC at -0.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.13%
Less D&A growth vs. RRC's 25.28%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
275.64%
Well above RRC's 29.16% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-328.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -169.71%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-328.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -168.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
224.19%
Some yoy increase while RRC is negative at -102.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-28.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RRC at -31.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
21.91%
Some CapEx rise while RRC is negative at -38.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-85.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 16.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-458.90%
We reduce yoy invests while RRC stands at 54.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-294.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RRC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-20.41%
Negative yoy issuance while RRC is 624.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.81%
Buyback growth of 17.81% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.