PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.22%
Negative net income growth while RRC stands at 17028.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.34%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -9.06%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-173.24%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.47%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -591.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.47%
Growth well above RRC's 68.98%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
123.72%
Some yoy increase while RRC is negative at -26.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
12.92%
Some CFO growth while RRC is negative at -30.44%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-19.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -13.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 1906.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-105.59%
We reduce yoy invests while RRC stands at 90.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
32.90%
Debt repayment growth of 32.90% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
95.48%
Stock issuance far above RRC's 31.69%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
12.03%
Buyback growth of 12.03% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.