40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
190.44%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -12.21%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.38%
D&A growth well above RRC's 8.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
141.65%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. RRC's 674.66%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-342.49%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RRC is 149.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-342.49%
Negative yoy usage while RRC is 693.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
4415.47%
Well above RRC's 44.89%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
13.29%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of RRC's 101.93%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
20.43%
Some CapEx rise while RRC is negative at -4.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RRC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-57.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -35.84%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
12.58%
We have mild expansions while RRC is negative at -1387.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
90.67%
Debt repayment growth of 90.67% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.06%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. RRC's 5709.45%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
35.04%
Buyback growth of 35.04% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.