40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.84%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -41.76%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
9.05%
Less D&A growth vs. RRC's 25.26%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-697.22%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1315.77%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -89.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1315.77%
Growth well above RRC's 20.09%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
128.43%
Some yoy increase while RRC is negative at -103.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-3.02%
Negative yoy CFO while RRC is 4.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-165.51%
Negative yoy CapEx while RRC is 19.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -792.69%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-189.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -75.20%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
230.06%
We slightly raise equity while RRC is negative at -36.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
100.86%
Buyback growth of 100.86% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.