40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1213.73%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -2087.47%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.11%
D&A growth well above RRC's 8.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
292.46%
Some yoy growth while RRC is negative at -431.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.66%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -174.25%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.66%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -1028.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-72.45%
Both negative yoy, with RRC at -203.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
13.66%
Some CFO growth while RRC is negative at -32.84%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-4.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while RRC is 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while RRC stands at 78.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with RRC at -3.78%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-113.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -111.74%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-32.86%
We reduce yoy invests while RRC stands at 39.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RRC's 52.77%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-79.29%
Negative yoy issuance while RRC is 7617.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
95.12%
We have some buyback growth while RRC is negative at -2.78%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.