40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-134.19%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RRC at -88.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.75%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -4.26%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-82.16%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.45%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -123.22%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.34%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RRC's 5986.87%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-1545.00%
Negative yoy while RRC is 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
215.67%
Some CFO growth while RRC is negative at -29.64%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -84.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
42.47%
Some acquisitions while RRC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
23.58%
Some yoy expansion while RRC is negative at -194.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
16.70%
Below 50% of RRC's 308.84%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-11.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 37942.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -412.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RRC's 2.22%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-75.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -108.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
44.06%
Buyback growth of 44.06% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.