40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
212.67%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -190.23%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.49%
Negative yoy D&A while RRC is 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
382.89%
Some yoy growth while RRC is negative at -191.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.37%
Well above RRC's 295.67% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.57%
Some yoy usage while RRC is negative at -7.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
6.84%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RRC's 139.27%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
48.38%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RRC's 28.70%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-15.78%
Negative yoy CapEx while RRC is 13.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
5.77%
Acquisition growth of 5.77% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
224.47%
Purchases well above RRC's 83.01%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
15.78%
We have some liquidation growth while RRC is negative at -84.58%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-18.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -48.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
0.47%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. RRC's 12.24%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while RRC is 121.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while RRC is negative at -94.56%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.