40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
269.37%
Net income growth similar to RRC's 290.43%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-0.25%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with RRC at -191.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-267.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RRC stands at 306.59%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-146.15%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RRC at -84.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
62.33%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -326.10%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.33%
Some yoy usage while RRC is negative at -278.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-10.00%
Both negative yoy, with RRC at -87.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
63.91%
Some CFO growth while RRC is negative at -60.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
10.63%
Some CapEx rise while RRC is negative at -31.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
262.79%
Some acquisitions while RRC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-103.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while RRC stands at 87.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
317.65%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x RRC's 58.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
5.77%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. RRC's 592.01%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
20.04%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. RRC's 63.87%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
50.00%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of RRC's 94.94%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.