PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.49%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -6.94%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-21.59%
Negative yoy D&A while RRC is 100976537.93%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
35.94%
Some yoy growth while RRC is negative at -21.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
80.00%
SBC growth well above RRC's 68.06%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-42.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -13.74%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.00%
Negative yoy usage while RRC is 451.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
256.67%
Some yoy increase while RRC is negative at -177.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-1.10%
Negative yoy CFO while RRC is 15.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
40.80%
CapEx growth well above RRC's 40.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
668.69%
Acquisition growth of 668.69% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-10.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -42.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-40.80%
Both yoy lines are negative, with RRC at -66.15%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
40.59%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. RRC's 102373.45%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
153.68%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. RRC's 401.60%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-4166.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -740.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.