40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2541.03%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -3735.06%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.29%
Negative yoy D&A while RRC is 219.94%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2283.33%
Some yoy growth while RRC is negative at -384.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-624.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RRC at -262.24%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-85.30%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RRC is 152.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
125.00%
AR growth while RRC is negative at -162.60%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.67%
Negative yoy usage while RRC is 188.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-478.95%
Negative yoy while RRC is 4295.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-36.84%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RRC at -5.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
33.27%
CapEx growth well above RRC's 9.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
4388.89%
Acquisition growth of 4388.89% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1500.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 1119.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
86.02%
Investing outflow well above RRC's 161.42%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
4.35%
We repay more while RRC is negative at -572.92%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.