PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
226.57%
Net income growth above 1.5x SD's 49.88%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-48.89%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SD at -1.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
1240.68%
Deferred tax of 1240.68% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.30%
Well above SD's 54.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above SD's 54.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.02%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -248.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
21.05%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SD's 12.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
18.58%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SD's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-155.78%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
168.74%
Purchases growth of 168.74% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-162.53%
We reduce yoy sales while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-157.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -62.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
365.10%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -56.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
17.77%
Debt repayment growth of 17.77% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
227.31%
Issuance growth of 227.31% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-186831.83%
We cut yoy buybacks while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.