40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.50%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 49.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.85%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SD at -1.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
89.98%
Deferred tax of 89.98% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
Well above SD's 54.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
Growth well above SD's 54.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
65.57%
Some yoy increase while SD is negative at -248.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
36.66%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SD's 12.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-11.37%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-127.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -62.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-447.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -56.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-70.02%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2.34%
Issuance growth of 2.34% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
50.69%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of SD's 100.00%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.