40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.52%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 49.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.52%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -1.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-32.86%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1999.85%
Well above SD's 54.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1999.85%
Growth well above SD's 54.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-206.74%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -248.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-32.85%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 12.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
15.48%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SD's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.97%
We have some outflow growth while SD is negative at -62.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
194.71%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -56.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
46.76%
Debt repayment growth of 46.76% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
114.50%
Issuance growth of 114.50% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-44431.11%
We cut yoy buybacks while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.