PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.69%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 49.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.13%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -1.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
275.64%
Deferred tax of 275.64% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-328.54%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 54.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-328.54%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 54.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
224.19%
Some yoy increase while SD is negative at -248.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-28.82%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 12.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
21.91%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SD's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-85.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -62.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-458.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -56.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-294.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-20.41%
Negative yoy issuance while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.81%
Buyback growth below 50% of SD's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.