40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.22%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 49.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.34%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -1.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-173.24%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.47%
Well above SD's 54.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.47%
Growth well above SD's 54.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
123.72%
Some yoy increase while SD is negative at -248.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
12.92%
Operating cash flow growth similar to SD's 12.39%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-19.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -62.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-105.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -56.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
32.90%
Debt repayment growth of 32.90% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
95.48%
Issuance growth of 95.48% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
12.03%
Buyback growth below 50% of SD's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.