PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2316.00%
Some net income increase while SD is negative at -320.48%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-24.50%
Negative yoy D&A while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.92%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.05%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SD at -262.91%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
4147.62%
Well above SD's 69.12%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-48.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SD at -70.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
38.21%
CapEx growth well above SD's 16.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-84.85%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.62%
We have some outflow growth while SD is negative at -8333.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
155.57%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -836.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
52.77%
We repay more while SD is negative at -141.32%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-50.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SD is 226378.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.