PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-134.19%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 92.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.75%
D&A growth well above SD's 3.35%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-82.16%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 202.12%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.45%
Slight usage while SD is negative at -140.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.34%
Growth of 83.34% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-1545.00%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -15161.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
215.67%
Some CFO growth while SD is negative at -24.89%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -24.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
42.47%
Acquisition growth of 42.47% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
23.58%
Purchases growth of 23.58% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
16.70%
We have some liquidation growth while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-11.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -92.22%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-3.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -31.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while SD is negative at -90.39%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-75.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
44.06%
Buyback growth below 50% of SD's 97.04%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.