40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
212.67%
Net income growth under 50% of SD's 463.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-0.49%
Negative yoy D&A while SD is 54.01%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
382.89%
Some yoy growth while SD is negative at -2854.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.37%
Slight usage while SD is negative at -43.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.57%
Growth of 159.57% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
6.84%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SD's 1271.63%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
48.38%
Some CFO growth while SD is negative at -27.16%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -12.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
5.77%
Acquisition growth of 5.77% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
224.47%
Purchases growth of 224.47% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
15.78%
Liquidation growth of 15.78% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-18.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -7221.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
0.47%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -26.06%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while SD is negative at -2928.05%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.