PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.82%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 202.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.87%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
176.39%
Well above SD's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Slight usage while SD is negative at -262.49%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Growth of 245.16% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-843.75%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -266.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
38.84%
Some CFO growth while SD is negative at -63.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-5.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -4.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
103.70%
Acquisition growth of 103.70% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-266.67%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.63%
Liquidation growth of 5.63% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-2.44%
We reduce yoy other investing while SD is 21.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-4.25%
We reduce yoy invests while SD stands at 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-40.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 33.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.